The last I browsed this topic, the consensus was that macros, and not the food source, is what determines the rate at which you gain/lose muscle/fat. So this to me indicates that a food's glycemic index has no direct impact on muscle/fat gain/loss.
Is this still the case?
Has there been any research in recent years that supported otherwise?
Provided that I consume the same macros, would consuming low GI foods yield better results in terms of body composition vs. high GI foods?
In terms of it affecting my gym performance, I really not have noticed much, if any, difference between low vs. high GI foods. The only times where my gym performance suffers as a result of eating is if I workout right after eating a ****load of food.
Is this still the case?
Has there been any research in recent years that supported otherwise?
Provided that I consume the same macros, would consuming low GI foods yield better results in terms of body composition vs. high GI foods?
In terms of it affecting my gym performance, I really not have noticed much, if any, difference between low vs. high GI foods. The only times where my gym performance suffers as a result of eating is if I workout right after eating a ****load of food.
from Bodybuilding.com Forums - Nutrition https://ift.tt/2nZPon7
0 comments:
Post a Comment