New systematic review challenges the idea that volume should be reduced in a deficit

https://link.springer.com/article/10...-04896-5#Sec12

https://twitter.com/BradSchoenfeld/s...CyzZ7lgLUpAAAA

I am personally very skeptical; in my experience it's always better to keep intensity and drop volume in a deficit.

But perhaps others agree and that may make for an interesting discussion.

Edit: Just looked through it briefly and it seems basically worthless because none of the studies included seem to compare different volumes. So basically impossible to draw any clear conclusions. To their credit the authors acknowledge this as a limitation, but will probably downplay that in social media... seems like this was only published because Schoenfeld's name is on the paper


from Bodybuilding.com Forums - Nutrition https://ift.tt/8plhbfc

0 comments:

Post a Comment